Like
before, I will be updating as I become aware of potentially interesting films. It looks like a pretty damn interesting year coming up, with alot of bold projects that could make or break things. There are alot of familiar faces behind the projects and the potential for either greatness or complete failure is seperated by a razor-thin line. Superman Returns tops this list as my most anticipated film of the year, and is also one of the most anticipated films of all time for me.
Apocalypto -
Mel Gibson has big brass ones. I think his movies get progressively better. While not at all religious, I found
The Passion of the Christ to be a wonderfully realized version of a story told countless times, but this time with a brutal flair and a wonderfully mystic visual style. The trailer has a funny easter egg that disrupts the serious nature of the work. Is that Saddam? You'll know what I mean when you see it.
TrailerCasino Royale - I'm a Bond fan but of the
Sean Connery era. I thought
Pierce Brosnan made an excellent Bond, but everything with the exception of
Goldeneye was crap that got progressively worse. I mean come on...an invisible car??!? And now that Brosnan has gotten the rather abrupt
boot, they've got relative newcomer
Daniel Craig reporting in as the new 007. I like Craig...but not as Bond. He's just too -- I don't know -- rough to be Bond. He's more suitable as the bad guy. Like Star Trek, this is a franchise that's in dire need of a vacation for awhile until some worthy material can be gathered. While this backtracking of material is a nice move (Casino Royale is an actual Ian Flemming novel, his first in fact), I think it would have been wholly appropriate (and awesome) to make it -- ceremoniously -- Brosnan's last Bond, as Craig I think lacks that 'cool' that this movie will probably require in spades, pun intended. But as will be a common saying with many of these upcoming films, we'll just have to wait and see.
Clerks 2 -
Kevin Smith movies are fun and stupid. I like most of them even though they're certainly not pinnacles of modern film. Supposedly, this one is for
Jason Mewes, who Kevin Smith promised another role to if he stayed off the junk. Looks like it worked. I hope they shoot this one in black and white also, and try to stay close to the 'shaky' look of the first one. There is a small trailer out, and all I can say is that a dancing
Rosario Dawson already guarantees my ass in a seat.
TrailerThe Da Vinci Code - I've never read the book but I am quite aware of the controversy, especially among the bible thumpers which, as always, makes it interesting to me. Sound cast and crew, especially my future wife
Audrey Tattou. I really like
Tom Hanks, but I would have preferred someone else, maybe
Harrison Ford as supposedly the main character was based on.
Ron Howard has come a pretty good ways lately, and I was surprised at how much I really liked 2005's
Cinderella Man. Trailer looks interesting.
TrailerThe Departed - First of all, this is a remake of a Hong Kong action film called
'Internal Affairs', which I have yet to see. Second of all, the cast looks absolutely spectacular. Thirdly, this is
Martin Scorsese. It's a trend that alot of these older generation directors seem to attach themselves to the 'it' movie stars of today (like Woody Allen and Scarlett Johansen) which I don't think is a good thing, especially Scorsese's 'attachment' to
Leonardo DiCaprio. He's not a bad actor, it's just that he has been unsuitable in past Scorsese films. One of the reasons I disliked
Gangs of New York was because he was so unconvincing as a badass-come-hero and came off as nothing more than a pretty boy with some terrible facial hair. While
The Aviator was a great movie, DiCaprio did NOT capture the presence and stature of Howard Hughes in the least. I was never convinced I was watching Hughes; more that I was watching an actor portray him in an entertaining, 'golden era of Hollywood' way that I could forgive. But since I'm a mostly forgiving person (and I don't know anything about the material), I'll give him a chance in this one. The cast is simply amazing though.
Jack Nicholson? You've sold me already, chief!
Flags of Our Fathers -
World War 2 has had a large focus put on it lately, especially with the
European Theater. It looks like the focus is beginning to shift to the
Pacific Theater, with 2005's
The Great Raid sort of signaling that change. In addition to this new project from
Clint Eastwood, we also have a new HBO miniseries focusing on events in the Pacific from the makers of the truly great
Band of Brothers, entitled simply
The Pacific War. Flags of Our Fathers tells the story of the brutal battle of Iwo Jima from the American side, and the heroic, famous flag raising atop Mt. Suribachi that would become not only a result of the success of the battle, but immortalized in one of the most famous
images in history. Most incredibly, Eastwood is also working on a movie at the same time that deals with the Japanese side of the event, entitled Lanterns in the Wind. Supposedly both films will be released at the same time. If this is true, it's an amazing opportunity to see two sides of a conflict in such a close proximity of time, making for a much more objective view of the time. It's a tactic relevant to any time in history, but especially now.
The Fountain - Very few movies have gone through production hell as badly as this one.
Darren Aronofsky's previous works,
Pi and
Requiem for a Dream, are great movies and show a real strength towards visual style. From the trailer, this one looks to be the same if not more. The imagery looks simply amazing, and Aronofsky knows how to put his characters into bizarre and oftentimes desolate situations.
TrailerMiami Vice - Two words :
Michael Mann. This guy is amazing and already has quite the track record. Last year's
Collateral was excellent and from the trailer for Miami Vice, it looks like Mann is going to once again going to demonstrate his ability to capture the essence of a location as well as imbue the fim with a realist rawness. Like Collateral, this is being shot on HD DV instead of film which gives the film a realistic, less filtered look, so to speak. I don't like
Colin Farrell and think even less of the
murderer-supporting Jamie Foxx, but let's hope they can bring a freshness as well as a throwback familiarity to the Crockett and Tubbs characters which is already embedded in most of our 80's culture-ridden minds.
TrailerMission Impossible III - It's more of a curiosity than anticipation. It's a shame for Tom Cruise that he can't escape his offscreen antics like his character can escape life-threatening situations. I think what they've done to this franchise is typical of the treatment of older material with it's disgusting revionism. The show was about the team; this franchise is about
Tom Cruise, nothing more. It's a ballsy move casting
Phillip Seymour Hoffman as a bad guy, and I can't tell if it's an attempt or not to lure in those type of movie viewers that normally flock to his types of film.
TrailerThe New World - I still have yet to see anything by
Terrence Malick other than
The Thin Red Line, which is one of my favorite movies of all time (probably in the Top 20, if I ever make a list). I love his attention to nature and it looks like this one will convey that detail as well. Word has been good on this one, and all indications are that it is a multi-layered, deeply meditative attempt at bringing to life that era and the characters who braved the dangers of a new world. A very sound cast, including
Christopher Plummer and the always great
Christian Bale. But then there's Colin Farrell...again.
Trailer Rambo IV - I admit it. I like the first two Rambo movies. The
first one was an enjoyable, moody, violent flick about an animal that had been pushed into a corner and was now striking out against an entire town. It's a nice movie to watch when you feel the whole damn world is against you. The
second Rambo was a finely tuned action movie that is extremely entertaining and features one of the finest movie scores ever (RIP
Jerry Goldsmith). The
third one is pretty much garbage, with only the Goldsmith score and some exciting helicopter chases as redeeming points. In a two-punch combo,
Sylvester Stallone has announced he is attempting to resurrect two very 80's franchises (or nearly, in one instance), with Rambo IV being attempt one along with Rocky Balboa, or Rocky VI, being the other. In this newest Rambo adventure (wow, never thought I'd hear myself say that!), the titular warrior goes up against skinheads when a girl is kidnapped or something like that. Now why they don't send him back to Afgahnistan to battle terrorists is beyond me. But this new Rambo, just like the new Rocky, sounds like Rubbish.
Rocky Balboa - (Note: this one is listed as a 2007 film) File this under the same 'trainwreck curiosity' categogy as Mission Impossible and Rambo IV. The
first two Rockys were very good movies. The franchise gets worse as it goes along, except for
Rocky IV, which was strangely imbued with a lively and intoxicating spirit, plus an excellent training montage. Rocky V...well, no need for explanation. So now 16 years later, a nearly 60 year old Stallone has decided Rocky's story just isn't finished yet. Or he needs more money. So once again Rocky steps back into the ring to get nearly obliterated by his opponent before 'going the distance' to finally win. I wonder if Rocky finally learns to block in this one. From what I've read, this looks like it's going to be as expected; an unnecessary sequel to a long since dead franchise that will do nothing to change that fact.
A Scanner Darkly - Yet another movie based on a book I haven't read. The trailer intrigued me quite a bit since this film is shot very non-conventionally (although done before in films such as Waking Life. The film is shot with digital video and then animators meticulously trace over the live action, or
rotoscoping. Why they don't just use the live footage I'm sure is a question for the ages. However, it makes for a very surreal viewing experience which is quite beneficial, especially for a story of this caliber. I'm very curious about this one.
TrailerSuperman Returns - This film is notorious for being even worse in production hell at one time than The Fountain. You can read a pretty thorough history of the production of this film
here. It's gone through countless directors and actors, but finally settled on
Bryan Singer who dropped
X-Men 3 for this. That's bad for X-Men, as
Brett Ratface Ratner is now in the director's chair, but it should be a very good thing for Superman. It's hard to describe exactly how I feel about the
Richard Donner Superman movie. I absolutely adore it. It's by far my favorite comic book movie and it's also a perfect example of a nearly 'magical' film that just oozes with charm, spirit, and warmth. I'm love/hate with
Brandon Routh who is the new Superman. No one can even come close to
Christopher Reeve, but sometimes depending on certain pictures or blurbs about Routh, I'm convinced they might have done their best
in an attempt to find someone worthy of picking up the fallen torch. While I like the fact that they're planning on using themes from
John Williams's INCREDIBLE soundtrack to the first Superman movie, I don't understand why they didn't simply get Williams back on board instead of having
John Ottman incorporate the themes alongside his own new material, which surely will be more numerous than the original score in the film. Just going on source material, this is my most anticipated film of 2006.
TrailerV for Vendetta - I'm finally about to get the graphic novel. Supposedly word is very good on this. Too bad they couldn't hit the November 5th date ("Remember, remember the fifth of November...", watch the teaser to see what could have been).
Hugo Weaving is awesome. Early reviews (
here,
here, and
here)from
Ain't It Cool News (yes I know, grain of salt alert) have been overwhelmingly positive as if they have perfectly captured the novel and it's message. It's going to be interesting since this novel deals with a terrorist as a protagonist who is trying to usher in the overthrowing of a facist government with a tendency to use murder and explosions to make points. It's marketed like an action movie, but if it's like the book -- and the aforementioned reviews note that it indeed is -- people may be disappointed that it's more of an insinuation of action and a deliberately-paced examination on how we percieve those that are in charge. This film is my second most anticipated film for 2006.
TrailersX-Men 3 - As noted, I think this film is doomed. Badly.
Ratner is nothing more than a fratboy with too much power, and I doubt seriously if he can pull off a comic book film after the pop dreck he's been churning out. And to add insult to injury, this appears to be the final entry in what is a severly underdeveloped trilogy. From what I know through script reviews and the like, it looks like they're cramming this one with too many things going on and too many characters. It's like the film is made of many little stories instead of being one cohesive narrative which leads me to believe this may not be the team-oriented picture that it should. It's a shame. With the success of
Batman Begins and the potential of Superman Returns, it looks like
DC may take back it's dominance from the 70's and 80's and hold onto it for awhile.
Trailer